Date posted: 06/10/2025 8 min read

Hybrid work and return-to-the-office directives in New Zealand

Our New Zealand HR expert advises CAs on your rights and responsibilities when it comes to remote work, hybrid work and return-to-the-office directives.

Hybrid working arrangements are much more common than ever before, but what happens if HQ requests employees to return to part-time or full-time office work? 

Read on to find out what our expert had to say.


The expert

Sharon McDonald

HR professional Sharon McDonald is a human resources consultant and founder of McDonald HR in New Zealand.


 

For managers

  • What’s your advice in terms of hybrid or work-from-home expectations, and the impact it will have on attracting and retaining talent?
    Employees are increasingly prioritising work-life balance over other benefits. Studies by organisations such as Forbes and LinkedIn have found that employees who work from home are often more productive and engaged, and are less likely to leave than their in-office peers. In addition, hybrid and remote working widens your talent pool, and is an effective lever in attracting and retaining talent. But it is not a magic formula: the approach needs to be well structured.

    Start with a role function audit to determine what roles can accommodate working from home. Consider factors such as the type of work, the extent that physical presence is required and confidentiality or safety issues. To avoid ambiguity, document the terms in employment agreements or a policy.

    If you choose a contractual arrangement for hybrid or remote work, include an opt-out clause that allows you to review, vary or revoke the arrangement with reasonable notice.
  • Should firms have a different policy for different functions or new starters? Should they make hybrid a perk, contingent on performance?

    Employers can set different terms for different functions. A role-based rubric (different terms and conditions for different roles) is advised to ensure objectivity.

    A temporary arrangement for new starters of three to six months of full-time or near full-time office working can be a good idea while the new starter is onboarding and both parties are building mutual trust.

    Positioning hybrid or remote working as a benefit can promote accountability, reward performance and provide a mechanism for managers to address concerns. However, it must be fair, transparent and well documented, including defining what good performance means (KPIs), review cycles, trial periods, the process to revoke hybrid or remote working arrangements, and an appeal process.

  • If the firm moves back to in-office work and someone doesn’t adhere to the new policy, what’s a reasonable response?

    If the work-from-home arrangement was in the employee’s agreement with no opt-out clause, it is binding and would require the employee’s agreement to vary it.  

    If working from home is not contractual, explore options such as a phased return or a hybrid model. If this does not resolve the matter, put your expectations in writing, outlining the potential consequences. If a staff member is still non-compliant, follow a fair and reasonable disciplinary policy.

  • If an employee has always worked remotely but HQ now wants everyone in the office, what’s your advice?
    lf the employee’s agreement specifies hybrid working and you want to make a change unilaterally, this could be a breach of their employment agreement. Even if working from home isn’t contractual consultation is important before you make any changes.

For employees

Got a question for Abby?

Send your questions. Any questions we publish will be anonymous.

[email protected]